| WRAP-AROUND MODEL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Content |
Communication |
Assessment |
Management |
|
| Type: |
Tools: Strong conferencing tools |
Criteria-based |
CHOICE OF: |
|
| |
-small group |
Some use of traditional short
answer and essay online tests |
|
|
| Static –
some |
> bulletin boards |
Peer review |
> System FAQ |
|
| |
> list serve |
indirect through discussion
comments |
> Progress tracking |
|
| Interactive
– some |
> email |
|
> Diary |
|
| |
> live text chat |
|
> Annotation |
|
| Dynamic –
mostly |
> instant messenger |
|
> Compile |
|
| |
> web video conf. |
|
> What’s New |
|
| Design:
individual activity content supported |
> telephone |
|
(dynamic content) |
|
| > linear narrative not critical |
Need moderation guidelines |
|
> Sitemap |
|
| |
|
|
> Search |
|
| > presented in small ‘chunks’ |
|
|
> Language translation |
|
| >
content FAQ |
|
|
|
|
|
Go to Summary Totals => |
|
|
|
| communication
weak now because we have said had a go but no big incentive to suggest that
it is worth persuing. |
|
| Because
what we have done is give them a reason to go in, but peer/advisors didn't
reply. We will need to 'call them' to return. |
| We lost the
good first impression. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|